Skip to main content
Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety

Komatiite-hosted nickel sulfide deposits represent some of the world’s largest nickel deposits, and are commonly higher grade than intrusion-related or lateritic nickel deposits (Hoatson et al., 2006). Western Australia hosts several world-class examples of komatiite-hosted nickel sulfide deposits, including Kambalda, Mt Keith and Perseverance (Hoatson et al., 2006).

Massive, net-textured and disseminated sulfide ores are commonly present in komatiite-hosted nickel sulfide deposits. Sulfide ores frequently comprise pyrrhotite+pentlandite±pyrite±chalcopyrite.

Key processes include the ascent of high-degree partial melts into the crust, typically along long-lived crustal structures. The magmas are dynamic and turbulent, which enables assimilation of crustal material, leading to the introduction of external sulfur to the magma. Nickel, copper, cobalt and PGEs are scavenged from the magma and concentrated in sulfide droplets. These sulfides are concentrated in the crystallizing magmas as massive, net-textured and disseminated sulfide ores (Barnes et al., 2016).

Derived layers are grouped based on their critical features:

SOURCE – of komatiite magma

PATHWAY – location of lithospheric faults and continental lithosphere margins, responsible for transport of komatiitic magma through the crust

CHEMICAL TRAP – addition of sulfur and sulfur saturation of previously sulfur undersaturated magma

CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL TRAP – sequestering metals into sulfides

PHYSICAL TRAP – concentration of metal-rich sulfides

PRESERVATION – of nickel orebodies

The Mineral System Tree is the graphical display of a mineral system analysis- showing the link between Critical/Constituent processes and their recommended targeting features and GIS layers.

Komatiite Hosted Nickel Tree Mineral System Tree: Komatiite-hosted nickel

Barnes, SJ, Cruden, AR, Arndt, NT and Saumur, BM 2016, The mineral system approach applied to magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide deposits: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 76, p. 296–316, doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.06.012.

Hoatson, DM, Subhash, J and Jaques, AL 2006, Nickel sulfide deposits in Australia: Characteristics, resources and potential: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 29, p. 177–241.

Barnes, SJ, Cruden, AR, Arndt, NT and Saumur, BM 2016, The mineral system approach applied to magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide deposits: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 76, p. 296–316, doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.06.012.

Barnes, SJ and Fiorentini, ML 2012, Komatiite magmas and sulfide nickel deposits: A comparison of variably endowed Archean Terranes: Economic Geology, v. 107, p. 755–780.

Barnes, SJ, Hill, RET, Perring, CS and Dowling, SE 2004, Lithogeochemical exploration of komatiite-associated Ni-sulfide deposits: Strategies and limitations: Mineralogy and Petrology, v. 82, p. 259–293.

Hill, RET 2001, Komatiite volcanology, volcanological setting and primary geochemical properties of komatiite-associated nickel deposits: Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, v. 1, p. 365–381.

Hoatson, DM, Subhash, J and Jaques, AL 2006, Nickel sulfide deposits in Australia: Characteristics, resources and potential: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 29, p. 177–241.

Le Vaillant, M, Fiorentini, ML and Barnes, SJ 2016, Review of lithogeochemical exploration tools for komatiite-hosted Ni–Cu–(PGE) deposits: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v. 168, p. 1–19, doi:10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.05.010.

Lesher, CM and Keays, RR 2002, Komatiite-associated Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposits: Geology, mineralogy, geochemistry and genesis, in The geology, geochemistry, mineralogy and mineral beneficiation of the platinum-group elements edited by LJ Cabri: Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum; Special Volume, p. 579–617.

Subject matter experts:

  • Steve Barnes (CSIRO)
  • Margaux Le Vaillant (CSIRO)

Back to Top